Alkhafaji, Abbass F. 1989. A Stakeholder Approach to Corporate Governance: Managing in a Dynamic Environment.New York: Quorum Books.
Aoki M., 1984, The Cooperative Game Theory of the Firm. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Blair M. M., 1995, Ownership and control : Rethinking corporate governance for the twenty-first century, The Brookings Institution, Washington D.C.
Carroll A. B., 1984, Business and society : Ethics and stakeholder management. Cincinnati OH : South-Western,.
Coase R. H., 1937, The Theory of the Firm, Economica, N. S.
Freeman R. E., 1984, Strategic management : A stakeholder approach. Boston : Pitman.
Pfeffer J. et Salancik G. R., 1978, The external Control of the Organizations. Harpers and Row, New York.
Phillips R., 2003, Stakeholder Theory and Organizational Ethics. San Francisco, BK Publishers.
Post J., Preston L. and Sachs S., 2002, Redefining the Corporation : Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth, 2002. Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press.
Votaw D., 1965, Modern corporation. Prentice-Hall.
Williamson O. E., 1985, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York : Free Press.
Williamson O. E., 1975, Markets and Hierarchies. New York : Free Press.
Périodiques
Agle B. R., Mitchell R. K. and Sonnenfeld J. A., 1999, Who matters to CEO ? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corporate Performance, and CEO Values. Academy of Management Journal, 42 (5) : 507.
Alchian A. A. and Demsetz H., 1972, Production. Information Costs, and Economic Organization. Economic Review, 62 : 777.
Antonacopulou E. P. and Méric J., 2005, A critique of stake-holder theory management science or a sophisticated ideology of control ? Corporate Governance, 5 (2) : 22.
Aoki M, 1986, Horizontal vs Vertical Information Structure of the Firm. American Economic Review, 76 (5).
Aoki M., 1990, Towards an Economic Theory of the Japanese Firm. Journal of Economic Litterature, 26 : 1.
Attas D., 2004, A Moral Stakeholder Theory of the firm.Ethique et économique, 2 (2).
Berman S. L., Wicks A. C., Kotha S. and Jones T. M., 1999, Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter ? The Relationship Between Stakeholder Management Models And Firm Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42 (5) : 488.
Berthon J., 2000, Indices et performances boursières dans l’investissement. Revue d’Economie Financière : 56.
Blair M.M. et Stout L., 1999, A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law. Virginia Law Review, 85 : 248.
Boatright J., 2006, Quel avenir pour la gestion des parties prenantes ? Les ateliers de l’éthique, 1 (1) : 42.
Boatright J., 1996, Business Ethics and the Theory of the Firm. American Business Law Journal, 34 : 217.
Bratton W. W., 2002, Enron and the Dark Side of Shareholder Value. Tulane Law Review, 76 : 1275.
Cappelen A. W., 2004, Two approaches to stakeholder identification. Ethics and Economics, 2 (2) : 1.
Chandler A. D., 1992, Organizational capabilities and the Economic History of the Industrial Enterprise. Journal of Economic Perspectives : 6 (3).
Clarkson M. B. E., 1995, A stakeholder framework for analysing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20 (1) : 92.
Davenport K., 2000, Corporate Citizenship : A stakeholder Approach for Defining Corporate Social Performance and Identifying Measures for Assessing It. Business and Society, 39 (2) : 210.
Dooley M. P., 1992, Two Models of Corporate Governance. Business Law, 47 : 461.
Donaldson T. et Preston Lee E., 1995, The stakeholder theory of the corporation : concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20 (1) : 65.
Eisenhardt K. M., 1989, Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. Accounting Management Review, 14 (1) : 57.
Evan W. N. and Freeman R. E., 1993, A Stakeholder Theory of The Modern Corporation : Kantian Capitalism. In G. D. Chryssides and J. H. Kaler, ed., An Introduction to Business Ethics, London : Thomson Business Press : 254.
Evraerts S. et Lacroix M., 2004, Responsabilité sociale et reporting de la performance. In La responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise, Mélanges en l’honneur du professeur R. Pérez : 37. EMS.
Ferran E., 2001, Corporate Law, Codes and Social Norms – Finding the Right Regulatory Combination and Institutional Structure. Journal Corporate Law Study, 1 : 381.
Flannigan J. R., 1995, The Economic Structure of the Firm. Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 33: 105.
Freeman R. E. and Evan W. M., 1990, Corporate Governance : A Stakeholder Interpretation. The Journal of Behaviour Economics, 19 (4) : 337.
Friedman A. L. et Miles S., 2002, Developing stakeholder theory. Journal of Management Study, 39 (1) : 1.
Hansmann H. et Kraakman R., 2001, The End of History for Corporate Law. Geo. Law Journal, 89 : 439.
Harribey L., 2005, Corporate social responsibility as a new paradigm in the European policy : How CSR comes to legitimate the European regulation process. Emerald JournalCorporate governance, 6 (4) : 358.
Harrison J. S. and Freeman R. E., 1999, Stakeholders, Social Responsibility, and Performance ; Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 42 (5) : 479.
Hart O., 1989, An Economist’s Perspective on the Theory of the Firm. Col. L. Rev., 89 : 1757.
Heath J. et Norman W., 2004, Stakeholder Theory, Corporate Governance and Public Management : What can the History of State-Run Enterprises Teach us in the Post-Enron era ? Journal of Business Ethics, 53 : 247.
Hill C. W. L. and Jones T. M., 1992, Stakeholder – Agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29 (2) : 131.
Hillman A. J. and Keim G. D., 2001, Shareholder value, stakeholder management and social issues : what’s the bottom line ? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2) : 125.
Hosseini J. C. and Brenner S. N., 1992, The stakeholder theory of the firm : A Methodology to generate value matrix weights. Business Ethics Quarterly,2 (2) : 99.
Husted B. W. and Allen D. B., Is it Ethical to Use Ethics as Strategy ? Journal of Business Ethics, 27 : 21.
Husted B. W., 2000, A Contingency Theory of Corporate Social Performance. Business and Society, 39 (1) : 24.
J. Igalens et J.-P. Gond, 2003, La mesure de la performance sociale de l’entreprise : une analyse critique et empirique des données ARESE. Revue de Gestion des Ressources Humaines, 50 : 111.
Ireland P., 2005, Shareholder Primacy and the Distribution of Wealth. Modern Law Review, 68 : 49.
Jensen M. C., 2001, Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance: 8.
Jensen M. C., 1993, The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of the Internal Control Systems. Journal of Finance, 3 : 831.
Jensen M. C. et Meckling W. H., 1976, Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3 : 305.
Jensen M. C. and Meckling W. H., 1979, Rights and production functions : An application to labour, Management, firms and codetermination. Journal of Business, 52 (4).
Jones R. and Murrel A. J., 2001, Signaling Positive Corporate Social Performance. An event Studies of Family-Friendly Firms. Business and Society, 40 (1) : 59.
La Porta R., Lopez-De-Silanes F., Shleifer A., Vishny R., 1998, Law and Finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106 : 1113.
Lee I.B., 2005, Peoples Department Stores v. Wise and the « Best Interests of the Corporation ». Canadian Business Law Journal, 45 : 212.
Lépineux F., 2005, Stakeholder theory, society and social cohesion. Corporate Governance, 5 (2) : 99.
Manne H., 1965, Mergers and the Market for Corporate Control. Journal of Political Economy, 73 : 110.
Margolis J. D. and Walsh J. P., 2003, Mistery loves companies : rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48 : 268.
Mitchell L.E., 1992, A Theoretical and Practical Framework for Enforcing Corporate Constituency Statutes. Texas Law Review, 70 : 579.
Mitchell R., Agle B. and Wood D., 1997, Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience : defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22 : 853.
Norman W. and MacDonald C., 2003, Getting to the Bottom of « Triple bottom line ». Business Ethics Quarterly : 1.
Orlitsky M., Schmidt F. L. and Rynes S. L., 2003, Corporate social and financial performance : a meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24 (3) : 403.
Pesqueux Y. and Damak-Ayadi S., 2005, Stakeholder theory in perspective. Corporate Governance, 5 (2) : 5.
Phillips R., 2003, Stakeholder legitimacy. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13 : 25.
Phillips R. A., 1997, Stakeholder Theory and A Principle of Fairness. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7 : 51.
Preston L. E. and O’Bannon D. P., 1997, The Corporate Social-financial Performance Relationship. A typology and Analysis. Business and society, 36 (4) : 419.
Quairel F., 2004, La mesure de performance sociétale à l’aune de l’instrumentalisation comptable et financière, La responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise, Mélanges en l’honneur du professeur R. Pérez : 73. EMS.
Reichenbach H., 2005, Analyse critique et bilan des résultats obtenus. Petites affiches, 251 : 5.
Roman R. M., Hayibor S. and Agle B. R., 1999, The Relationship Between Social and Financial Performance : Repainting a portrait. Business and Society, 38 (1) : 109.
Roselle J., 2005, The triple bottom line : Building shareholder value. In Corporate social responsibility : The Corporate Governance of the 21st Century, International Bar Association Series, Kluwer Law International : 113.
Rossi M. J., 2006, Determinants of the relationship between strategic performance and shareholder’s value creation : Beyon financial, http://ssrn.com/abstract=933300.
Rousseau S., 2004, Le rôle des tribunaux et du conseil d’administration dans la gouvernance des sociétés ouvertes : réflexions sur la règle du jugement d’affaires. Cahiers de Droit, 45 : 469.
Rousseau S., 2001, Directors’ Duty of Care after Peoples: Would It Be Wise to Start Worrying about Liability ? Canadian Business Law Journal, 41 : 223.
Sarra J., 2002, Rose-Coloured Glasses, Opaque Financial Reporting and Investor Blues; Enron as Con and the Vulnerability of Canadian Corporate Law. St. John's Law Review:101.
Sternberg E., 1999, The Stakeholder Concept : a Mistaken Doctrine. Business Responsibilities.
Ullmann A., 1985, Data in search of a theory : a critical examination of the relationship among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance. Academy of Management Review, 10 : 540.
Vogel D., 1978, The resurgence of Shareholder Participation. In Lobbying the Corporation, Basic Books, New York.
Waddock S. A. and Graves S. B., 1997, The Corporate Social Performance - Financial Performance Link. Strategic Management Journal, 18 : 303.
Mc Williams A. and Siegel D., 2001, Corporate Social Responsability : A Theory of the Firm Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26 (1) : 117.
Wood D. J. and Jones R. E., 1995, Stakeholder mismatching : A theorical problem in empirical research in corporate social performance. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3 : 229.
Wood D. J., 1991, Corporate Social Performance Revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16 : 691.
Zambon S. and Del Bello A., 2005, Towards a stakeholder responsible approach : the constructive role of reporting, Corporate Governance, 5 (2) : 130.
Travaux non publiés
Allouche J. et Laroche P., 2005, Responsabilité sociale et performance financière des entreprises : une synthèse de la littérature, Working paper, Colloque « La responsabilité sociale des entreprises : Réalité, mythe ou mystification ? », Nancy.
Black B.S., Cheffins B. et Klausner M., 2003, Outside Director Liability. Working Paper, Stanford Law and Economics, n°250.
Brenner S. N. and Cochran P., A Stakeholder Theory of the Firm : Implications for Business and Society Theory and Research. Proceedings of the International Society for Business and Society, Sundance, Utah.
Brenner S. N. and Cochran P., A Stakeholder Theory of the Firm. Working paper, MGMT 90-1, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon.
Harribey L., 2006, La théorie des parties prenantes dans le référentiel communautaire et son impact dans les politiques européennes de recherche et d’éducation. Working paper, Colloque ADERSE, Bordeaux.
Porter M., 1992, Capital choices : Changing the Way America Invests in Industry. Research report presented by the council on Competitiveness and cosponsored by Harvard Business School, Washington.
